Thursday, September 11, 2025
spot_img
Home Blog Page 108

Why help to buy?

0
Help to Buy scheme…What could possibly go wrong?

It never ceases to amaze me how many politicians never seem to see beyond their next move. They certainly aren’t chess players. Yet again we see another politician blundering into a trap as obvious as any fools mate. His eye is firmly fixed on the immediate prize and he seems to be blind to the dangers. If only he could step back a bit and look at the whole picture.

People are warning David Cameron that his Help to Buy scheme will produce the opposite outcome to the one he intends, but he refuses to see it. “Trust the Bank of England” he cries. He might just as well have prefaced that with “If you can’t trust me”. His declared motive for the policy is that he doesn’t think it is fair that the only people who can afford to get a foot on the property ladder are those with rich parents. Quite right David.

…In many ways it resembles a student loan but instead of investing in a person the tax payer is investing in property.

So in order to even out this inequality he feels so deeply about, he has cast the British tax payer in the role of rich parent. We are about to lend would be purchasers of houses under £600,000 a full 20% of the market value through a Help to Buy scheme. In many ways it resembles a student loan but instead of investing in a person the tax payer is investing in property. What could possibly go wrong?

The government has been warned that this well intentioned move will fuel another housing bubble pushing prices even further out of the reach of first time buyers. We have seen that house prices rise in proportion to people’s ability to take out, but not necessarily to repay, the loan. Think toxic loans, financial meltdown, Northern Rock.

There is also a danger that a lot of this money will be used by people who don’t need it. It will be easy enough for those looking for a quick buck, to take the government money, buy a property, run around the board twice to see it rise by 30%, sell the property and pay the government back. But the even greater danger is that the bubble will burst and once again thousands of people will find themselves in negative equity. With only 5% of their own money tied up in the property there will be very little to stop those Help to Buy victims cutting their losses and throwing in the keys. We have been there before.

This is not a Monopoly game, people need houses to live in not to speculate with. Tinkering or rigging the market will not provide long term stability let alone cure a housing crisis. To take the heat out of the housing market we need to build more homes. Nothing else will work.

Help To Buy – Equity Loan

First Time Buyers Guide

The Beautiful Game (not quite)

0

Qatar, host nation of the 2022 World Cup, (that is soccer for our American followers) is busy building the infrastructure for the games. An expected 500,000 migrant construction workers will make their way across the Indian Ocean to provide the labour and for many it will be a one-way ticket.

Put bluntly the Health and Safety record on construction projects in this fabulously wealthy nation would be criminal if normal laws applied. Sharon Burrows, general secretary of the International Trades Union Confederation, predicts that more people will die building the stadia, roads and hotels than will take to the pitch through the entire tournament.

If each of those players came out with a black armband for the construction workers who will die it would shock the world, but it won’t happen. For a start the rulers of Qatar will not release the figures even if they keep them, which is doubtful.

It is estimated that one worker a day dies in Qatar on these projects and as deadlines loom and require higher output this figure will not go down. No guest worker in Qatar has the right to join a trade union and they must obtain an exit visa from their employer to leave the country. Any worker speaking out would, therefore, be imprisoned.

…part of the bidding process to host this prestigious event ought to include statements on workers’ welfare and on-site safety.

The workers are quite simply seen as disposable. Not all the deaths occur through incidents, some are the result of working long hours in extreme heat. If you think playing football for 90 minutes is hard in 50 deg cent try shovelling concrete.

People are worked to death and die in their sleep crammed into tin huts with no air conditioning. Yet these are not seen as work-related deaths even though they are in construction camps.

Surely part of the bidding process to host this prestigious event ought to include statements on workers’ welfare and on-site safety. It is scandalous that a nation as rich as Qatar cannot see its way to providing basic human rights to its ‘guest’ workers.

When you compare Qatar to the health and safety record of the London 2012 Olympics you begin to see that our triumphs as a host nation started long before the opening ceremony. Rather than ridiculing ‘health and safety’ we should be proud of achieving the safest ever construction project on the planet.

If the rulers of Qatar have no sense of shame then it is up to others to shame them. It is too much to hope that an organisation with the track record of FIFA will expend much energy in this area but ex-players such as David Beckham, who command the attention of the world’s media, are in a perfect position to champion the cause of these workers where nobody else can.

A well-timed and accurately placed statement from him would score a goal for human rights and seal his reputation as a true ambassador of sport.

Green Deal or no deal

0
As soon as I saw the way this green deal was shaping up I knew it was in trouble..

The British government has been working on ‘The Green Deal’ for several years now. It was originally the brainchild of the previous Labour government, but the coalition took the idea on and brought it to fruition. I say ‘fruition’ but that is hardly an accurate description because it has failed to even blossom, let alone bear fruit. There are currently just four households in the UK that have signed up. Yes that is four not four thousand or even four hundred.

When the government first started consulting on this scheme a lot of interested parties sat on endless committees and contributed their thoughts. As happens with these things people complained of being ignored but whenever you sift ideas there will be rejects and with that comes hurt pride. But looking at what got accepted I can’t help but wonder what the rejects looked like. They must have been very bad indeed because there seems to be no aspect of this scheme that appeals to the British homeowner.

A local builder could do the job just as well, probably better, for a fraction of the price…

As soon as I saw the way this green deal was shaping up I knew it was in trouble. The usual suspects began to emerge. Cold callers, ex double glazing salesmen in the guise of surveyors and people outside DIY stores with big smiles and clip boards. They were fooling nobody.

There are many aspects of the Green deal that are wrong. The extortionate interest rates being one, but the fundamental flaw is that there is no real competition for the work. When you look at some of the quotes being given for jobs such as insulation and double glazing, you start to get the idea that this is a cosy little club. At those prices and considering the 8% interest rate, the savings take too long to kick in.

A local builder could do the job just as well, probably better, for a fraction of the price. Furthermore, if the householder went to one of the High Street building societies, they would probably be able to secure a loan for 3 percent less than the ‘Green Deal’ rate.

So anyone who is serious about saving energy can either go through all the red tape and paraphernalia that seems to be part of any government package, or they can ring their trusted local builder who will come round on his way home, probably in his overalls not his suit, and give them an honest assessment of what is likely to be a good investment in energy saving.

Most of it is fairly obvious stuff, a new boiler, better controls, under-floor heating, draught proofing, double glazing, insulation and perhaps some solar panels.

The Green Deal – Overview

Experts Training To Deliver Green Home Scheme

Fake Chimney, Lost in Construction?

0
Fake Chimney Faux Pas

It might seem like a busman’s holiday but whenever I’m out enjoying myself, I still can’t stop looking at buildings. Now comes the bit where I inflict my holiday snaps on you, and if you are well brought up you say “nice” but anyway feel free to comment.

The first is someone’s ingenious attempt to protect a gable end wall from the weather. This is a common problem where a building has been demolished, leaving another to face the elements. Many people do a bit of vertical tile hanging, but this builder has left part of the roof of the demolished building ,and supported it on cantilevered purlins. Nothing too unusual about that I suppose, but look at the chimney.

It’s hanging in mid air. What possible reason could there be for leaving it there, and what is supporting it? This is not a glass fibre fake chimney; there is half a ton of brickwork up there.

It just looked wrong. If you are going to fake something, you do it properly or don’t bother…

On the subject of fake chimneys, which some house developers think adds character to their new homes, I saw one a while back that was clearly a fake. You could tell because you could see straight in through the bedroom window and where the chimney breast should have been, there was the open space of a large bedroom. It just looked wrong. If you are going to fake something, you do it properly or don’t bother.

The second picture I wanted to show you is a slate roof in Luxembourg. There are many fine examples of slate work in Northern Europe, particularly the numerous church domes. It seems that slaters just can’t resist trying to outdo each other.

Odd tiling in Luxembourg

On this roof they have not only swept up the cheeks of the dormer windows, but the whole slate roof has been run at an angle, rather than being parallel with the ridge. I could see no practical reason for doing this, but then I started wondering if it’s something to do with snow and ice. Slates laid on the slant are less likely to be dragged down if the snow slides off. Each one is held by the one below.

I have no way of knowing if this is the reason and I can see nothing in the roofing manuals that supports this theory, so perhaps they were just showing off after all – and there is nothing wrong with that. Perhaps that’s also what the fake chimney is all about.

More From Skillbuilder – Whats Supporting This Troublesome Chimney?

Why Have A Fake Chimney?

Washing Machine – Indecent Exposure

0
The fault lies not in the cupboard or the washing machine..

I had a call-back on a job today. The kitchen unit doors were knocking together. I assumed it would just be a simple matter of adjusting the self-closing Blum hinges and I would be on my way. It turned out that the hinges causing the problem were not Blums but the hinges attached to the washing machine.

For those of you in any nation but Britain I must just explain that we have this odd idea of putting the front-loading washing machine in the kitchen. Don’t ask me why it’s just the way it happens to be. Obviously we don’t like it because we then attempt to hide it behind a cupboard door so all you can see is a clean row of cupboard doors. There are two ways of doing this. One is to leave the doors on the cupboard carcass and the other is to attach the door to the washing machine itself.

The problem is that washing machines, especially front loaders, have a tendency to move slightly when they are in fast spin. Given that the gap between cupboard fronts is around 5mm on each side you can appreciate that you are on a hiding to nothing in trying to maintain that gap.

I explained to the customer that this is not an installation fault, but a design fault. The fault lies not in the cupboard or the washing machine but in the marriage between the two. The kitchen unit manufacturers cannot be expected to cater for a washing machine that walks and the washing machine manufacturer cannot be expected to stabilise the machine within such fine tolerances.

“So what” asked the customer “is the solution?” I thought for a while and eventually in desperation suggested. “The only solution is to remove the decorative door and expose the naked front of the washing machine”.

She was horrified. The idea of spoiling the nice clean line of kitchen cupboards with a washing machine front was so abhorrent that she could hardly believe I had dared suggest it. What kind of Philistine was she dealing with?

What I should have done at that point was tell her that there are some things in life that aren’t fixable but something in me resists that piece of logic.

I played around with the feet and repositioned the machine centrally. Then when her back was turned I took a couple of her tea towels and rammed them deep down into the gap on either side of the machine. I used a long spatula to make sure they were so deep that she wouldn’t detect them. In engineering you might call it a shim, which makes it sound a whole lot better than a bodge.

Skillbuilder Call backs – Why Your Shower Tray leaks

How To buy The Best Integrated Washing Machine

Under-floor Heating Timebomb

0
Under-floor Heating Troubles

As the popularity of under-floor heating increases we are inevitably seeing a larger number of faulty installations. This is the way of the building industry, but it needn’t be so. Plumbers are often called in to pipe up under floor heating manifolds to the heating systems after the floor loops have been laid by others.

Because it is trapped, the pipe expansion will take place within the walls of the pipe rather than along it…

Laying pipes into screeded floors might seem like a job for the labourer (beneath plumbers’ dignity) but entrusting this job to someone who doesn’t have the background knowledge is where mistakes are made, and hidden, until a future date when the pipes fail. The whole system might stand up to a pressure test and be assumed to be fine, but when laying heating pipe under screed you need to keep in mind that:

  • Plastic pipe expands and contracts as it heats and cools.
  • This expansion doesn’t cease when it is buried in sand and cement.

Because it is trapped, the pipe expansion will take place within the walls of the pipe rather than along it, but where the pipe leaves the cement screed and enters free air is a critical point. Suddenly it is able to expand and contract freely along its length and the point of transition is susceptible to abrasion. It must be sleeved at this point either with plastic conduit or pipe insulation to prevent this happening. If this isn’t done there is a risk of leaks occurring.

The other vulnerable point in under screed pipes is the thresholds between rooms. The screeds between rooms always crack at this point and this is a wholly good thing because it allows each room to act independently. It does however mean that the pipe at that point will move minutely and, again, abrasion can wear the pipes. This will also happen where pipes go through walls

Pipe failure could be 10 or 15 years from now, and whilst plumbers and builders will be free of their warranty obligations by then, it is not a long time in the life of a building, or perhaps I am out of step by thinking that pipe which is guaranteed for anything from 25 to 50 years ought to actually last that long in a building as well as a laboratory.

Which Underfloor Heating System Is Best For You?

Leveson Inquiry – Halls of Smoke and Mirrors

0
How will the outcome of the Leveson Inquiry will affect the behaviour of the British media?

Im not sure what the answer to this is, but it needs to get a move on before the High Court building falls into rack and ruin.

There’s also the possibility that the door is now a computer generated image and the reporter is just standing in front of a green screen…

The rendering on the pillar on the left hand side of the door has been patched and scratched in the most appalling way. A five year old could have done a better job. I would guess it was frost damaged last winter and since the enquiry has had a continuous stream of witnesses arriving and leaving through that doorway there has been precious little opportunity to cordon off the area and carry out a proper repair to the rendering.

Continuing this theme I have often wondered how the front door of 10 Downing Street is kept in such immaculate condition. Quick drying water based paint can’t be the answer because it’s such a high gloss finish. My theory is that they have two doors and simply swap them over when nobody is about. There is also the possibility that the door is now a computer generated image and the reporter is just standing in front of a green screen.

So much film and television is done in this way that it is sometimes difficult to establish what is real and what it not. It makes you wonder why they bother with those iconic backdrops for live outside broadcasts. Dragging crews out in the dead of night to give the illusion that they are somehow on the spot is such a waste of resources. Of course, if it did eventually happen that reporters claiming to be live on location around the globe were in fact tucked up in a nice warm studio out of harm’s way we would need to look into the ethics of such a thing. An enquiry into press ethics, where have I heard that before?

Leveson Inquiry Report – At A Glance

More From Skillbuilder – Rendering Tips For Patch & Repair Work

Landfill Tax – Take A Hike!

0
Massive Hike In Landfill Tax Announced

The Government has announced a massive hike in Landfill tax, and the building industry is up in arms! This is a charter for fly-tipping if ever there was one. Skip companies are saying that this will kill their business and they are planning to disrupt Jubilee celebrations, then the Olympics. They obviously fear for their livelihoods, but I wouldn’t be so sure that they will lose out.

After the U-turn over pastie tax, they probably think they need a softer target than the militant pastie eating hordes.

There is already a small army of pickup trucks roaming the streets, offering to get rid of rubbish for cash and we know that this rubbish is fly-tipped. It may sit there for a while but sooner or later it has to be removed and most of it is loaded into skips and finishes up in a landfill.

The only difference is that the people who’ll be paying the increased landfill tax, plus the cleanup charges will be the ratepayers. As local authorities have no money as it is, they will find this extra burden hard to bear; but bear it they must, because it won’t be long before the rubbish is piled high in the streets.

Rubble in skip

The declared intention of this landfill tax, is to encourage manufacturers to think about the reduction of waste, and for the geniuses in Whitehall it all looked so simple. We are sending too much to landfill, so we need to encourage recycling. We have come so far by voluntary actions, winning the hearts and minds of those with green roots, but now we need to punish those nasty builders etc. who are still chucking too much away. The only problem is that builders and home improvers feel they have been punished enough.

If you want to put a skip outside your house where I live it costs you £300, including the licence you have to pay the local authority for clogging up their roads. Post landfill tax hike, there will be a charge of £65 per ton which goes straight to government. I said the “declared intention” of this increase in tax is to reduce landfill, but a very handy spin-off is that the government raises much-needed revenue. After the U-turn over pastie tax, they probably think they need a softer target than the militant pastie eating hordes.

Having said all this, I have some sympathy for the cause of reducing waste to landfill. We do produce way too much rubbish and something needs to be done. The population is increasing, and we are constantly being told that we need economic growth. Growth means that we produce more than we did last year, and more the next year than we did this year. I am no Einstein, but more stuff means more rubbish.

Last year I built a modest extension on a house and by the time it was done I had used 12 skips. I wasn’t happy about this and would have loved to use half that number. What is now being suggested is that the skips are made so expensive, that I put pressure on the merchant and other suppliers to take their packaging back, or better still not to send it in the first place. I also know that stuff is wrapped for protection and ease of handling. If they put less wrapping on things there will be an increased risk of damage which means more wastage.

The only way that this landfill tax issue is going to be resolved is to have a massive increase in recycling, and that means letting builders bring their rubbish into local authority run recycling centres, or taking it back to merchants. I was recently in Germany where plastic and metal containers are brought back to the supermarket, and fed into a machine that sorts them out and gobbles them up. The shopper is then issued with a credit on their next purchase of tins and bottles. It seems to work, but that’s Germany for you.

Landfill Tax Rates

Dont Throw Your Foam Gun Away

Rustic Appeal

0
Does Rustic Appeal To You?

I came across this building up at Snape Maltings on the Suffolk coast. The original building was almost gone, and the new owners could have taken it apart bit by bit and rebuilt it with lime mortar, and importing used bricks to make up the considerable deficiency.

…there’s a touch of Antony Gormley’s Angel of The North in letting the metal brave the elements.

They decided on a different approach, which was to weld up some steel plates (boiler plate) rather in the manner of an upside down ship. The master stroke was to leave it unprotected – so it rusted. There is a touch of Antony Gormley’s Angel of The North, in letting the metal brave the elements. It may not be the kind of thing that many people want to live in, but among the restored Maltings and cottages of that area, this building stands out and I believe in a good way. Presumably they have some very effective insulation on the inside.

Tell me what you think.

Condensing Boiler Blunder

0
Condensing boilers have undoubtedly become more reliable over the last few years..

But the last couple of winters saw thousands of householders caught out by frozen condensate. Manufacturers offer clear guidelines for avoiding freezing, but not every job offers the opportunity to do things by the book and terminate the condensation inside the building. If the pipe runs to an outside drain, then there is always a chance that it will freeze. In response to this, we now have a number of products on offer which will stop condensate pipes from freezing. Invariably these use electric trace heating (electric blanket) for the pipe. An average cost for fitting trace heating is around £200.

…installers are being advised to redouble their efforts to find somewhere inside the building to terminate the condensate.

The question is who pays? If you’ve had a condensing boiler fitted in the last few years and have suffered a breakdown due to the condensate freezing, you might reasonably expect the person who installed it to carry out the remedial action free of charge, on the grounds that the boiler was not fit for purpose. However, it seems that many installers are arguing the point saying that practice of lagging the pipe should have been enough under normal circumstances to prevent freezing, and the only reason the pipes are now freezing is abnormal weather. In other words, the boiler will work fine so long as it doesn’t get very cold. Some would say that this misses the point.

The quick fix offered by many installers and manufacturers of condensing boilers last winter, was to take a kettle of hot water and pour it over the condensation pipe. It’s a very British solution to, ‘put the kettle on’ and the site of people out in their dressing gowns at 6am with steaming kettles has a kind of pathetic charm.

In the longer term, installers are being advised to redouble their efforts to find somewhere inside the building to terminate the condensate. Ideally, this will be a soil stack or waste pipe from a kitchen sink ,but I give full marks to a heating installer I came across the other week, who found a handy soil and vent pipe close by to put his condensate into. He drilled a hole and fitted a strap on boss (sounds pornographic if you aren’t a plumber) and left the condensing boiler in good working order.

A few hours later the householder called to say that there was dripping coming through the ceiling. The installer, being a psychic, said he knew the cause without even coming back to the house. It was the WC upstairs which was leaking.

The householder found it strange that this should happen at the very time the condensing boiler was fitted and the dripping had stopped since he switched off the boiler, but the installer insisted that it was nothing to do with him and told the householder that coincidences must happen, otherwise there would be no such word as ‘coincidence’. Not only was it nothing to do with him, but he wasn’t interested in fixing the problem because he was a heating installer – not a plumber. He hadn’t spent thousands of pounds gaining his gas safety certificates just to end up messing about with bogs.

So it came down to me, a lowly jobbing plumber, no job too small. It took me less than five minutes to track down the leak. It wasn’t coming from the WC at all; it was dripping out of the ceiling fan.

The reason it was dripping out of the ceiling fan was that the installer had terminated the condensate into a length of grey plastic soil pipe, that he took to be the vent section of the soil and vent pipe. It was in fact the vent duct from the extractor fan.

Mistakes happen and I wouldn’t judge him too harshly on this one, except for the fact that he still wasn’t putting his hands up to the error. He had taken the pipe to be a soil pipe in good faith when he had put in the estimate, and the fact that it wasn’t meant that he now had to run the condensate pipe some considerable distance to pick up the said soil pipe. Suddenly he was the aggrieved party.

The householder was faced with a bill for another £200 to do the job properly, or he could poke it out of the wall and take responsibility for it freezing. But if it did freeze all he would need is a kettle full of hot water.

Why Home Owners Love These Condensing Boilers

What Is A Condensing Boiler?

Building Site from Hell

0
I am currently working on the building site from hell..

It was a job I took on against my better judgment. When I was pricing it, alarm bells were ringing in my head because there was a new spec and drawing almost every day. The job itself isn’t actually that bad; it’s a complete re-plumb on a large central London house with an ensuite on every bedroom, and underfloor heating throughout. The money is good, but what makes it so difficult is the bloke running it. He calls himself a builder, but he has no idea.

Almost daily, my mate and me enter into protracted arguments with him about the difference between the way he says he does it in the Middle East, and the way we do it here. Invariably we walk off the job in protest at the latest demands. We only go back because the client, who is a lovely person deserving of much better than this idiot site agent, pleads for us to return. We agree, provided we can do the job the way we always do it.

“Even at this stage, there isn’t a day that goes by when the drawing doesn’t have an amendment…”

Quite what his appeal is we don’t know, but there is some kind of family link and it doesn’t do to get between family. Even at this stage there isn’t a day that goes by when the drawing doesn’t have an amendment; the boiler has been in three places, the shower room has changed, the bathroom has been turned 90 degrees and every pipe run is moved and moved again. We have three 90 degree spigot bends one after another on a horizontal soil run, because the architect had overlooked a steel beam that is in the way. It will block, we know it will. They will have to set up an account at Dyno-Rod.

It isn’t just us that are unhappy on this building site; every trade in the house has been subjected to the same kind of lunacy. Walls move, doors are altered this way and that and crazy demands are made. The vast expanse of folding patio doors had to be remade, because the floor insulation hadn’t been taken into account.

As is common on most building sites these days, there is every nationality under the sun. We all rub along very well and have a laugh and a joke united in our hatred of the common enemy, the site agent. We have been on to him for weeks to supply a porta-loo, but he gives us a bucket and we use it behind the shed. It’s a return to a time I thought was over.

His latest demand, when arriving at the building site, is that we turn on the central heating to dry out the floor screed. It was laid over our pipes only 6 days ago and he wants us to fire up the heating and dry it out so he can lay the oak flooring. I have told him it will crack and turn to powder if the moisture isn’t allowed to stay in it long enough for it to complete its hydration, which is usually 28 days give or take. I told him that until that time, the more moisture you can hold in the screed the better.

A screed is laid almost dry and it needs all the moisture to stay in and hydrate the cement, but Abdul knows best. Despite the fact that some of the tradesmen speak very little English, they all have this phrase “Abdul knows best” word perfect. For our part we are learning lots of new languages, or at least the swear words.

More From Skillbuilder – 1 In 10 Homeowners Unhappy With Building Work

Building Site Regulations

Fault Finding – A Plumber’s Tale

0
The golden rule that I have followed through years of fault finding is ‘never assume and never jump to conclusions’.

OK that is two fault finding golden rules, but the basic message is never say you know something until you prove it. This has stood me in good stead, where other tradesmen have come and gone from a job missing one small fact that changed everything. This is not superior wisdom, just hard won experience from getting it wrong. And sometimes I still get it wrong as this job proves.

I had been called out to look at a fault finding leak around the bath. It is almost always due to a defective silicone seal, but I didn’t just assume that. I checked it by spraying water all around the edge of the bath. Sure enough the water poured down. Positive proof! Fault finding completed!

The leak had been going for some while and made a real mess. We got the job to take the bath out, renew the rotten chipboard floor and cover the walls with Knauf Aquapanel, before re-tiling. This was the fourth flat in the block to suffer from these problems and it had caused bad feelings among the owners, so this customer didn’t want any further trouble from his bathroom. He didn’t mind paying for a good job, but he wanted a guarantee. Now I know there are some plumbers who would not put their name on a piece of paper that says ‘this won’t leak’ but I was 100% confident in both my plan and fault finding accuracy.

Firstly we were going to renew the floor, and then we were going to get rid of the plasterboard at the shower end and put up some tile backer board. We were also going to beef up the stud work to prevent any movement. Then we were going to tile the floor under the bath so the tiles came right up to the wall. The Ardex shower waterproofing system would then be used to make a damp proof membrane that ran down the walls behind the bath and onto the floor, so any leak would not be able to seep down under the floor.

There would be a silicone seal between the bath and the wall, and then another silicone seal after the wall had been tiled. It was near enough a week’s work to do this but I told the customer that I was sure after all that it wouldn’t leak, but if it ever did (which I doubted) he would know about it because the water would seep out from under the bath panel and appear as a puddle on the tiled floor. This might seem like belt and braces, but it is actually standard practice on the Continent, we are almost alone in ending the tiles just under the bath panel.

We obviously tested the bath waste, and even replaced the flexi tap connectors – just for good measure. I have heard too many horror stories about flexis springing a leak and would never use them in a flat. We finished on Friday lunchtime and everything looked good. That weekend I received a text saying that a puddle had appeared on the bathroom floor.

Fault Finding – Fault Not Found

It was Sunday morning but I went straight over. The leak appeared to be coming from the bath waste so I took it apart. There were traces of Plumber’s Mait on the underside of the waste, which indicated that this had been a previous problem which someone had tried to fix. We had obviously disturbed a bad repair. Plumber’s Mait is not suitable for bedding in wastes of any sort, but thousands of people use it for this job every year. If you ask Evo-Stik, the manufacturers, they will verify that it is unsuitable for wastes. If you need a sealant for wastes then silicone is much better.

I removed all of the Plumber’s Mait and, because the rubber seals looked fine, left them to do the job they were designed to do. I ran the bath and it looked OK. Monday morning I got another text ‘Bath still leaking, please fix today’. This time I decided to renew the whole pop up waste assembly. It looked fine.

Monday night text number three ‘still leaking, pissed off’. Looking on the positive side at least – the idea of tiling up to the wall and sealing the wall to floor joint had paid off with an early warning of what was really a small leak. If we hadn’t done this, then the people in the flat below would have been the first to know.

Fault Finding – Fault Found

I went back to the bathroom and after half an hour of having the bath full of water and nothing coming out, I wondered if the problem was more to do with the person using the bath, than the bath itself. He was a big guy and I wondered what difference it would make if you had another 110kg in the bath. It all seemed solid but would things start flexing? My next fault finding move was how to simulate this. I certainly didn’t want him sitting in the bath while I crawled about with a torch, even if he was willing. It would take a month of Sundays to get that image out of my head.

I lay there, head on the floor, deep in thought. It was at this point that the torchlight caught a single silver drop of water. It wasn’t coming from the waste; it was coming from the glass fibre of the bath. I pushed it with my finger and a few more drops came down. I discovered that the bath was spongy. I could actually push a blister of water around. Clearly it had leaked through the acrylic top and been trapped by the reinforcing coat of glass fibre. I shone the torch down through the water and there it was a hairline crack.

The one thing I hadn’t proved at the outset, was that the bath was watertight. Because 95% of leaks on baths turn out to be from around the silicone seal, I had jumped to the conclusion that it was the cause and I hadn’t looked at a secondary cause.

The task now was to remove the damaged bath (easy with a recip saw) and then fit a new bath, without damaging all those lovely new tiles or the new bath. That was slightly trickier because it was a snug fit. The customer, obviously not expecting to lose weight any time soon, decided to go for a steel bath. Good choice in his case.

When we cut that old bath in half you could see the weak spot. It was all along the edge of the chipboard reinforcing panel, where the inner acrylic joined the outer glass fibre. There was a triangular void all the way along both edges. It was inevitable that it would fail fat bloke or not, but the fact that the percentage of obese people in Britain has now reached epidemic proportions, means that plumbers will be busier with this kind of work. Something to bare in mind when fault finding in a bathroom for sure.

More From Skillbuilder – Fault Finding & Diagnosing Problems

Knauf Aquapanel Boards

Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Surge

0

I have just read that the number of carbon monoxide poisoning incidents has increased over last year. The reason isn’t entirely clear, but I will offer two suggestions.

Firstly, the exceptionally cold winter. Nearly all carbon monoxide poisoning is from open-flued appliances such as gas fires. These require a through-flow of fresh air from outside. Natural ventilation which may be tolerated during a mild winter suddenly becomes an icy blast. I saw several incidents last year where people had taped up air bricks and tried to seal every available gap around the doors and windows.

the need to keep going for refresher courses and paying out extortionate fees for registering has pushed out perfectly competent fitters…

Secondly, the cost of having a Gas Safe engineer out to service the appliance has risen because many people, such as me for example, who are not specialising in gas work find the Gas Safe registration and training courses too onerous for the amount of gas work I do. At most I may install five boilers a year and service another ten. This does not justify registration so I now end up getting them done by a sub-contractor.

I am all for safety but the need to keep going for refresher courses and paying out extortionate fees for registering, has pushed out perfectly competent fitters and given those left in the game the opportunity to charge more. I don’t blame them for this because they have to cover the cost of all those courses. As with so many things, it is the poor who suffer – particularly those in fuel poverty because they either forgo the annual service, or use an unregistered service engineer who may or may not know what he/she is doing.

My proposal is that the HSE lets people who prove their competence through an exam, register for a small fee. We would then pay a notification fee to Gas Safe for each appliance we work on. This would mean that those who did a small amount of work would not have to pay a disproportionate fee.

All gas work would be subjected to random inspections by local safety inspectors, who would be paid out of that fund. Any installation that didn’t pass a safety test would be shut down and the installer sent for training, or banned according to the severity. At present, there is a voluntary scheme where a household can nominate their gas work for random inspection. This leaves the householder feeling as if they are snitching on the installer (because the installer is informed by Gas Safe) and the installer may therefore be reluctant to return for annual servicing.

If there were a duty on the householder to send off the registration card, this would protect the consumer from such accusations and make sure that all gas work is subjected to random inspection. I am sure there are reasons why this would not work and there are those out there who may think it is no better than the system we have right now, but if the number of deaths from carbon monoxide poisoning is increasing, then it is clear that something isn’t working.

Another idea I will put up for discussion is for Gas companies to offer free service and safety checks to the elderly.

Building Company Fined – Children Risked Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

MORE FROM THE NHS

The symptoms of carbon monoxide poisoning are not always obvious, particularly during low-level exposure.

A tension-type headache is the most common symptom of mild carbon monoxide poisoning.

Symptoms of carbon monoxide poisoning

  • Dizziness
  • Feeling and being sick
  • Tiredness and confusion
  • Stomach pain
  • Shortness of breath and difficulty breathing

The symptoms of exposure to low levels of carbon monoxide can be similar to those of food poisoning and flu.

But unlike flu, carbon monoxide poisoning does not cause a high temperature.

The symptoms can gradually get worse with prolonged exposure to carbon monoxide, leading to a delay in diagnosis.

Your symptoms may be less severe when you’re away from the source of the carbon monoxide.

If this is the case, you should investigate the possibility of a carbon monoxide leak and ask a suitably qualified professional to check any appliances you think may be faulty and leaking gas.

The longer you inhale the gas, the worse your symptoms will be. You may lose balance, vision and memory and, eventually, you may lose consciousness.

This can happen within 2 hours if there’s a lot of carbon monoxide in the air.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE ON CARBON MONOXIDE AT NHS.UK

Precious Scrap Metal

0

Have you noticed any increase in the number of scrap metal men doing the rounds? I certainly have, not least because the scrap metal I had set aside recently on one of my jobs walked off after just ten minutes. Two hours later I had another visit from someone who was similarly interested, but this time he didn’t particularly care whether the copper tube was old or new. So keen was this young man on the concept of recycling, that he thought he might just cut out the middle man (me) and go from the merchant to scrap dealer without the copper ever being used for plumbing.

I stopped him in the nick of time. He was not particularly bothered by being caught like this. He had, in the process of stealing things from building sites, become desensitised to physical and verbal abuse. “It’s the Chinese” he said “They’re taking all the scrap and there’s a shortage”.

This champion of free enterprise who was scurrying down the drive with my copper, was just doing his patriotic best to help alleviate the shortage.

I was impressed by this immediate blame transference. He gets caught stealing and it is immediately the fault of some mythical figure from halfway around the world. It seems that the Chinese are now to blame for everything from global warming to material shortages. This champion of free enterprise who was scurrying down the drive with my copper, was just doing his patriotic best to help alleviate the shortage. By keeping the supply up he was also helping keep the price down – which is good for me when I have to replace it.

Scrap metal for recycling

It suddenly dawned on me that perhaps the problem is not that we don’t have enough raw materials, it is simply that these materials are not moving around the system fast enough. The 25 years (minimum) that copper spends lying around in people’s house is way too long. We need a much faster throughput.

The Scrap Metal Conundrum

If you are wondering what I did with the thief having recovered my property, the answer is nothing. I could have called the police but in my experience, they never turn up when you need them. I may also have ‘taught him a lesson’ but it wouldn’t have been not to steal, it would have been to run faster next time.

The serious point here is that scrap metal theft is now such a serious problem, that millions of pounds worth of cable is being stolen from our railway lines, manhole covers are being removed from roads and war memorials stolen. Scrap metal dealers know they are buying stolen goods, but often turn a blind eye. The Home Office is now looking to change the law to make it harder to sell scrap. They are looking at increased regulation of scrap dealers, which is a typical government response. Produce another licence. This is wishful thinking because the problem starts way down the chain from the legitimate dealers who would buy the licence.

The scrap metal business at this level is run like the drug trade, small dealers to bigger dealers and always for cash. In fact there are many drug addicts who rely on scrap metal theft for their daily fix. The only way that this business will be brought into line is if the cash is eliminated from the transaction.

If those people who earn their living roaming the streets looking for scrap could only receive payment through BACS, you would see an immediate drop in thefts. As it is at present they turn up at the scrap dealer with a false name, give a false vehicle registration and are gone. It is so easy and lucrative it is a wonder that everyone isn’t doing it.

Who Needs A Waste Carriers Licence?

Aircrete Blocks Cracking up – Unwanted Trouble

0

If you have been drawn to this blog by the title alone, I will save you wasting further time by saying from the outset that I am talking about buildings here – not a mental breakdown, though that can never be ruled out in the building game.

Certainly the owner of the house in this story needs an extraordinary degree of optimism and patience, in order to preserve his sanity, as his new house continues to crack before his eyes.

There are of course many reasons why buildings may crack, but this blog is talking about buildings made of Aircrete blocks, which a few months after completion started showing a number of large cracks.

As with so many of these problems, everyone involved is pointing a finger at someone else. Is it the blocks, the brickies, the plasterers or the architect who is to blame?

Aircrete blocks are lightweight and have a very high degree of insulation. When introduced they seemed like the wonder product of the age and to some extent, they do a job that no other materials can do.

I think it’s accurate to say that when they were first developed, the intention was to use them on internal skins of cavity walls instead of breeze blocks, which are heavier and not such good insulators.

This is still where they are mostly used. There are however a growing number of buildings being built with external skins of Aircrete blocks, and there are even buildings being built with solid Aircrete. That is to say no cavity.

The appeal of Aircrete blocks over bricks is speed and affordability. They are a good product in their own way, but the builder needs to understand their limitations.

The appeal of Aircrete blocks over bricks is speed and affordability. They are a good product in their own way, but the builder needs to understand their limitations.

 

Aircrete Blocks Golden Rule

There is a golden rule in the building industry that states:

‘mortar should never be stronger than the material it is joining’.

It’s a rule often broken. Having worked as a brickie’s labourer in my teens, I can tell you from my own experience two very good reasons that this rule is broken: One is laziness, and the other is ignorance.

Often the two go hand in hand. The general advice is that a cavity wall is brought up more or less equally on both sides, rather than building the inner skin and then the outer.

Again this isn’t always done, but if it is done then it is highly likely that the mortar being used is sometimes the same strength inside and out.

Labourers just can’t be bothered to chop and change mixes, or throw stuff away. At best they may put it back in the mixer and add a bit more cement, but even that is a hassle, so they tend to mix a fairly strong mortar for the bricks and serve it up for the blocks as well.

Another bit of advice is that Aircrete blocks should ideally be laid with a sand/cement/lime mix of around 6.1.1 or even 8.1.1 for Solar blocks.

If you look at how much lime a builders merchant sells compared to the number of Aircrete blocks he shifts, you will see that very few people follow this recipe.

It is far more likely that they will weaken the mortar with plasticisers or (in some cases) washing up liquid.

This gives them a lightweight mix with plenty of room for movement, but the problem here is that the amount of cement is not sufficient to cover all that sand.

I would argue that for this reason alone, lime is always better than plasticiser, because it mixes with the cement and spreads it further to form a more consistent mix.

The block manufacturers are painfully aware of all these problems and issue guidelines to avoid cracking.

This involves the use of movement joints, which must come all the way through the render. You only need to look around at rendered houses to see how rarely this is done.

That is the ideal scenario but, as I have said, the reality is that the labourer will often knock up a 4 or 5 to 1 mix of sand and cement with a squirt of plasticiser, which is then used throughout the build.

If the Aircrete blocks are used on the internal skin only, and that is later dry-lined with plasterboard, then the subsequent shrinkage cracks will never be seen. In any event this will probably do no harm.

If the Aircrete blocks are used on the external skins, then the cracks cannot be covered because they will almost invariably show through the render.

Even if the build mortar is the right strength to allow for movement in the blocks, this good work can be undone by applying render that is too strong.

Getting the render mix right is absolutely critical, but once again there are plenty of plasterers out there who struggle to keep a good coat of render on an Aircrete wall, and to make matters worse their answer is to use even more cement.

The real answer is to apply a slurry coat to the blocks and then when this is dry, apply the scratch coat.

The Aircrete block manufacturers are painfully aware of all these problems and issue guidelines to avoid cracking.

This involves the use of movement joints, which must come all the way through the render. You only need to look around at rendered houses to see how rarely this is done.

People just don’t like the look of them. The other measure to avoid cracking is to use bed joint reinforcement at vulnerable points. This is typically around and below windows.

The fact that there is no load directly beneath a window, means that the block work can simply pull apart in the middle.

Again, you only need to ask a builders merchant for bed joint reinforcement to see that it is rarely used. Very few stock it, and some merchants have never heard of it.

What this means is that block manufacturers can simply point to these omissions or errors and wash their hands of any problems. “If you don’t follow the guidelines, you only have yourself to blame” they will say.

I would say they could help a lot more by printing the guidelines on the packs, but I suspect they don’t really like the word ‘cracking’ to appear too close to their brand name.

There is another little point that can also help prevent cracking in rendered walls (this applies to brick as well) and that is the use of serpentine curves in the scratch coat.

It seems like such a small and insignificant thing, but it can make all the difference. If the first coat of render is lined through with horizontal lines, then the topcoat will grab it along these lines.

As that topcoat shrinks, it will pull on those horizontal lines, and hold the wall in tension as the render dries out and tries to shrink.

The problem is that all the tension is in a vertical direction, so the natural tendency is for the wall to move in the opposite direction, which is horizontal. So, as strange as it may seem, a horizontal scratch coat will produce vertical cracks.

Again I see hundreds of jobs where the scratch coat is horizontally lined, often with a notched tiling trowel.

Is it the Aircrete blocks, the Brickies, the Plasterers or the Architect who is to blame?

In fact, the whole approach of plasterers to rendering Aircrete blocks, is often completely wrong. They assume that the wavy lines which are put on the blocks at the factory, are a key for their plaster or render – which is wrong.

If you walk around many buildings using Aircrete blocks a few weeks after they have been rendered and tap the walls, you will often here a hollow sound.

Shortly after that come the cracks, and after that the solicitor’s letters, with everyone pointing the finger at someone else. The best excuse of all… the weather.

More articles and info

What’s the Best Mix for Rendering?

Thermalite aircrete blocks

Tax Laws Power Market Inequality

0

I have just heard an item on BBC Radio 4 about the huge increase in the cost of raw materials for the building industry. The price of Bricks and concrete have reportedly soared by a potent 20%! Tax laws are an important factor fuelling inequality within this market. While average inflation, according to the retail price index, shows a 2 or 3% rise, the cost of ‘trade’ inflation could be much higher.

The trouble is that there is no barometer for this because the cost of raw materials is only picked up when those materials go through to the retail sector. The retail price index measures a selected basket of items sold in the shops, and by ‘shops’ they don’t mean builder’s merchants.

“But for builders faced with rising materials costs, the fact that they can’t pass this increase onto the customer is not quite so good.”

The building industry is even further out of the loop because house prices are not even included in the inflation index. I suppose there is a good reason for that because houses can be sold on to people who have also benefited from price hikes, but if you are trying to save up for your first house, the rate at which prices are moving away from you is the most relevant bit of inflation there is.

Happily, for first time buyers, house prices are falling or at least static. But for builders faced with rising materials costs, the fact that they can’t pass this increase onto the customer is not quite so good. The only way that increased material costs can be absorbed is in reducing labour costs, or cutting profits. You can guess which is more likely. With high unemployment and a huge army of migrant workers looking for any job they can find, it is wages that end up bearing the brunt of this shortfall.

“Tax Laws Distort The Market”

For anyone looking to have work done on an existing property the fall in labour costs may also offset the rise in materials, but there is another factor which distorts the market – Tax laws. VAT is not charged on new builds, but is charged on home improvements. It is even more biased because small builders are sometimes zero rated for VAT because their turnover is below the threshold.

With VAT now being 20%, this can make a huge difference to a quotation. So although we have a 20% increase in materials there is a possible saving of 20% on labour costs if you turn tax laws to your advantage, and find a builder who is either not VAT registered or is willing to do the job for cash.

Do Tax laws punish the honest builder?

The idea of having a VAT threshold is to encourage start-up businesses, but I know plenty of builders who have been trading for 20 years or so who still manage to keep below the VAT threshold. They do this by working for cash, or getting the customer to buy the materials. Meanwhile, the honest builder (yes there are some) who is forced to charge VAT, loses jobs to the fly by nights.

The obvious answer here is to address unequal tax laws. The government should give the same VAT relief to home improvements, as they do to new build projects, or abolish the VAT threshold. I, and many others in the industry, would prefer tax laws to treat new build and refurbishments equally. It would be a brave move, but one which would give some real stimulus to our industry. At a time when there are skilled tradesmen stacking shelves in supermarkets and people are in desperate need of housing, bold change could make a huge difference.

More From Skillbuilder – VAT Explained

Gov Building Materials Commentary